I have often wondered why in life their are moments that seem to stick with us forever. A psychologist would say it must have been something traumatic or a very happy time for you to remember something that happened years earlier. That may indeed be true but a psychologist tends to focus more on negative things than positive. I know that for myself things that often stick with me are very simply a matter of being thought provoking and insightful to me and usually have to deal with things I have been pondering myself.
One of these instances happened to me recently. In the world we live in their are many times where judgements are brought upon people wether it be a simple matter of choosing who to surround ourselves with, or just dealing with the world we live in. I often remember of a talk given by Elder Dalin H. Oaks. The title of the talk is "Judge Not". I remember sitting in the back of a relief society room while on my mission and this talk seemed to speak to me very strongly. I guess one of the reasons it spoke to me so much is that I often had some of the same questions that Elder Oaks had.
I used to think of how am I supposed to not judge people as some scriptures say, yet I do need to make certain judgements about people in order to do the things God wants me too. Elder Oaks made a great point in that we are not to make final judgements against people as to condemn them to hell, but we are to make judgements as to who we should surround ourselves with, places we should go and other life decisions that may impact our eternal journey. We are to make intermediate judgments based on righteous gospel principles.
The following is seven guidelines when making Intermediate judgments. The fact of the matter is that all of us everyday make judgments about situations we encounter. As I first heard these things years ago I learned much about making judgments. Reading these things years later I am able to glean some valuable insights on how better to make intermediate judgments.
Guidelines by Elder Oaks:
First, a righteous judgment must, by definition, be intermediate. It will refrain from declaring that a person has been assured of exaltation or from dismissing a person as being irrevocably bound for hellfire. It will refrain from declaring that a person has forfeited all opportunity for exaltation or even all opportunity for a useful role in the work of the Lord. The gospel is a gospel of hope, and none of us is authorized to deny the power of the Atonement to bring about a cleansing of individual sins, forgiveness, and a reformation of life on appropriate conditions.
Second, a righteous judgment will be guided by the Spirit of the Lord, not by anger, revenge, jealousy, or self-interest. The Book of Mormon teaches: “For behold, my brethren, it is given unto you to judge, that ye may know good from evil; and the way to judge is as plain … as the daylight is from the dark night.
“For behold, the Spirit of Christ is given to every man, that he may know good from evil” (
Moro. 7:15–16).
The Savior taught that one of the missions of the Comforter He would send would be to assist in the judgment of the world by guiding the faithful “into all truth” (
John 16:13; see also
John 16:8, 11).
Third, to be righteous, an intermediate judgment must be within our stewardship. We should not presume to exercise and act upon judgments that are outside our personal responsibilities. Some time ago I attended an adult Sunday School class in a small town in Utah. The subject was the sacrament, and the class was being taught by the bishop. During class discussion a member asked, “What if you see an unworthy person partaking of the sacrament? What do you do?” The bishop answered, “You do nothing. I may need to do something.” That wise answer illustrates my point about stewardship in judging.
Fourth, we should, if possible, refrain from judging until we have adequate knowledge of the facts. In an essay titled “Sitting in the Seat of Judgment,” the great essayist William George Jordan reminded us that character cannot be judged as dress goods—by viewing a sample yard to represent a whole bolt of cloth (see The Crown of Individuality [1909], 101–5.
A fifth principle of a righteous intermediate judgment is that whenever possible we will refrain from judging people and only judge situations. This is essential whenever we attempt to act upon different standards than others with whom we must associate—at home, at work, or in the community. We can set and act upon high standards for ourselves or our homes without condemning those who do otherwise.
Sixth, forgiveness is a companion principle to the commandment that in final judgments we judge not and in intermediate judgments we judge righteously. The Savior taught, “Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven” (
Luke 6:37). In modern revelation the Lord has declared, “I, the Lord, will forgive whom I will forgive, but of you it is required to forgive all men” (
D&C 64:10).
Seventh, a final ingredient or principle of a righteous judgment is that it will apply righteous standards. If we apply unrighteous standards, our judgment will be unrighteous. By falling short of righteous standards, we place ourselves in jeopardy of being judged by incorrect or unrighteous standards ourselves. The fundamental scripture on the whole subject of not judging contains this warning: “For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again” (
Matt. 7:2; see also
3 Ne. 14:2).
The prophet Mormon taught, “Seeing that ye know the light by which ye may judge, which light is the light of Christ, see that ye do not judge wrongfully; for with that same judgment which ye judge ye shall also be judged” (
Moro. 7:18).
A standard can be unrighteous because it is too harsh—the consequences are too severe for the gravity of the wrong and the needs of the wrongdoer. I remember a conversation with an LDS newspaperwoman who described what happened when she reported that the Prophet Joseph Smith received the golden plates in 1826, a mistake of one year from the actual date of 1827. She said she received about 10 phone calls from outraged Latter-day Saints who would not accept her admission of error and sincere apology and even berated her with abusive language. I wonder if persons who cannot handle an honest mistake without abusing the individual can stand up to having their own mistakes judged by so severe a standard.
(End of Elder Oak's Comments)
I really enjoy the comments of Elder Oaks and for those who haven't read his talk, I would strongly suggest reading it. His comments about this topic have been some of the greatest insightful words on this topic.
We may often find ourselves in a place where we need to make judgments, but in this day and age many people make quick judgments without all of the facts. It takes a true disciple of Christ having a great deal of charity to not make quick judgments. It takes this type of person to say I will reserve my judgment until I gather more facts.
During the day I work with mostly women, which at times can be a very daunting task. I say this because I believe when a work place is not balanced with near equal numbers that one group may get too comfortable. When people get too comfortable with their position or surroundings they often begin to find petty things to argue about or small insignificant things can be made into a HUGE issues. When I am asked to remedy the problem I often find that quick uninformed judgments have taken place. At these times past issues seem to be brought up as well, but that subject is a whole different ball of yarn to unravel.
The real issue that often comes into play is getting a person to see a situation from another's point of view. A comment I have heard many times is "You cannot slice cheese so fine that it does not have two sides". Many issues in life have multiple sides to it. I do believe that if we follow some simple rules in making intermediate judgments about situations and not people that all issues have a remedy. These remedies can always be found when we have charity in mind.
C.S. Mencl